I actually wouldn't mind giving the House subpoena power to investigate things, just not under Leah Cushman's control, and not via a motion to suspend the rules like this
motion to suspend the rules fails 120-247; Kevin Verville moves to print the remarks in the permanent journal, but someone objects, so now we're voting again, and Republicans are roll-calling it again...
first up is SB340, with a long title. It's from Education; I think this is Peggy Balboni speaking against concurrence on the Committee of Conference report?
Speaker Packard is letting Speaker Emeritus Shurtleff preside over a few votes, bc Shurtleff will be stepping down to run for County Commissioner, since Tara Reardon is stepping down from her seat
HB1018 is from Commerce & Consumer Affairs; according to its title, it's relative to on-premise and off-premise liquor licenses, and relative to land in current use, but as it's been amended, it's really an anti-immigrant bill
bill (as amended) would give people the "current use" land use tax exception an even bigger tax break, so even ignoring the immigration part, it's bad even just on a tax policy basis. The "current use" exception is wildly abused, and has contributed to our crisis of invading Free Staters
HB1091 CofC report adopted 190-181; Speaker Packard now letting Matt Wilhelm preside as a courtesy/tradition of letting the minority leader preside on the last day of session
Jasen Stock of the NH Timberland Owners Association actually called me to whip votes against this bill, which is the 1st time I can remember having a hostile lobbyist calling me personally (recently, at least)… I told him I'd take his viewpoint into to consideration, which isn't really a commitment…
This bill was originally from the Special Committee Housing, and most of the other members of my committee (Municipal & County Government) besides me hate the very existence of the Special Committee on Housing, so...
ok thanks, he reminded her not to ascribe motive at least
(sometimes I think the rule against ascribing motive should be repealed, but enforcing it here is warranted)
Now under discussion: HB1241. Current legislator (whose name I really ought to know, but am blanking on at the moment) was originally going to speak against this bill, but has now changed his mind and is now speaking in favor.
Anyways, this is relative to the regulation of money transmitters and relative to license applications and renewals for certain consumer credit entities. Passes on voice vote.
Rep. Hoell... is moving to table this?! Does he realize they don't have the votes and just want to postpone it, or is he actually on the right side of this?!
Now on HB1386 from Env&Ag, it's relative to prohibiting the disposal of lithium-ion batteries in solid waste landfill facilities, composting facilities, or incinerators. J.R. Hoell speaking against, talking about how... he burned down a lithium-ion battery lab in Manchester once?
Yeah it seems kinda premature to be passing this legislation without also passing #RightToRepair first, but that's not a strong enough reason to oppose it for me. We can always pass R2R later