A fair question to Democrats would be "Why do you let corporate and dark money groups flood your primaries?" That's been a problem for a while, tho it doesn't seem to be Bowman's only problem here.
This is about AIPAC pouring money into Latimer's campaign, which everyone who follows this knew about already and is distinct from Ayo's claim (you guys are really bad at this btw).
What do you mean "let"? Do Democrats have any statutory authority they could use to prevent this that no one anywhere knows about? Citizens United was decided like a decade and a half ago and SCOTUS hasn't become more lefty in the interrim, so...
Democrats own the nomination process and could certainly put rules around it. Democrats could just exclude anyone who coordinated with corporate money during the primary from their party line. The general is different but parties control their own nominations.
