Post

I can't follow the medical side of these papers, but I am allowed to have an opinion on methods, right? If a masking protocol in a hospital requires donning a fresh mask before entering each patient's room, studying infection rates is not informative about "masking" per se, because *aerosols*.
Especially where I live, a lot of obviously bad papers have been published to push a political agenda. Many of those studies never passed peer review, including those that were obviously under-powered. Yet somehow amateurs are accused of epistemic trespassing for pointing out the obvious flaws.