Chris Wyman: Also asserts facts not in evidence about public opinion. People are broadly familiar with Roe after 50 years and know what restoring it directionally means. The Comstock act was on no one's radar until like last year and I don't see any evidence it's yet ripe for campaigning.

1) a weirdly hostile (“restore Roe is unpopular”) but on the right side post 2) an overly pessimistic (“this can’t happen”) but broadly correct about the hurdles post 3) a completely detached from reality (“Dems can win by losing”) post Discourse is broken, folks.

Also asserts facts not in evidence about public opinion. People are broadly familiar with Roe after 50 years and know what restoring it directionally means. The Comstock act was on no one's radar until like last year and I don't see any evidence it's yet ripe for campaigning.

And almost zero people see “restore Roe” as meaning “roll abortion rights back to the second before Dobbs dropped.”

Post