The replication crisis is often described as a crisis of false positives, but is it?
In our (re)new(ed) preprint, we show that false positives do not explain the replication crisis, and that varying rep. rates are often explained by replication sample size. #metascienceosf.io/preprints/so...
I have a surface understanding of this stuff but hate when ppl roll up in the replies, hambone, then use tags to show off to everyone how they "corrected a so-called expert", like some big gotcha, as if you need your own work explained to you. Go be wrong at Burger King if you need attention so bad.
