Speaking as a semanticist, it's wild to me that they are phrasing it in terms of whether an *act* is characterized as "official", when what they seem to actually be talking about is whether there exists a *description* of the act that can be characterized as "official".
Can any half-baked open and logically indefensible sophism be created in which we can describe an act as "official"? Then it will be deemed "official".
I am sorry but you need section 25 and go with Kamala *now*. The relief at having someone who can take it to Trump will be immediate & palpable.
It's important to raise Biden's health in the same breath, because the only path out of this is winning everything in November.
I wish there were a way you could run Obama again.
