"this new york time headline is misleading, unfair to post it"
also it isn't even misleading, and it's the same piece that gets written every time trump faces mild consequences for anything
there are times people criticize a piece they haven't read based on the headline, and I get that can be annoying to journalists, but this is a clear case of : take it up with the headline writer!
Exactly! This has been enough of a long-running issue, since Baquet purged the copy editors, that its past time for staff to take it up with the masthead.
It was a pretty high profile interview with Max’s boss involving maybe the most important newsroom leader in the entire world, many people talked about it for days, no reason he should be aware of it.
no golden age, but back in the day journalists used to like criticizing other outlets in the spirit of healthy competition and then at some point, for various reasons (including that most outlets closed), they closed ranks
Yet another casualty of market concentration, though in this case lees from lax antitrust enforcement against news outlets and more the decimation of the industry (by under-regulated businesses like FB and Google).
