The New York Times has mentioned Christopher Rufo more often in the last year than at least 4 cabinet officials (I didn't check them all) www.findinggravity.net/p/the-new-yo...
I would challenge New York Times employees to name a single progressive strategist who would be favored with a New York Times article simply for posting a few tweets critical of a newsroom executive.
There is none.
The Times privileges Rufo because it agrees with him.
the only thing that Chris Rufo and I agree on is that people should read my newsletter about the New York Times being in the tank for Chris Rufo www.findinggravity.net/p/the-new-yo...
Except that, unlike the accusers in the Salem Witch Trials, Rufo repeatedly states in public "I'm going to do everything I can to present shit out of context to destroy the lives of people I dislike, can you believe everyone keeps just going along with me when I do that?"
I actually find Christopher Rufo extremely uninteresting and unimportant. He's just the mascot; the New York Times* is the problem. It's using him as an excuse to do what it wants to do anyway. If he didn't exist, they'd find another. Just as they did before anyone had ever heard of him.
* etc
