it's hard to explain how racist jamaal bowman's primary challenger is and how little coverage that fact has received despite the fact that he's spent more than any primary candidate IN HISTORY
He keeps getting mad that Jamaal Bowman only “focuses on certain constituencies” and what he means is that Jamaal Bowman talks to black people too much
I want to say something snarky about Hillary, but I'm not.
Yes, he is horrible. We should support the incumbent unless there's a reason. Let's vote for the racist is not a reason.
You should go for it. People want to hold her up but she's an pandering elitist snob. She would have better that trump, that's why I voted for her, but she's definitely out of touch with working class people.
Weird that a national Dem would support a primary challenger yet the same people would not support Ned Lamont even _after he won the Senate primary against Joe Lieberman_ in Connecticut.
Looking forward to more voter-blaming from this crowd.
Could someone with good Wikipedia standing please edit Lattimer's page so that it emphasizes where his funding from this election comes from and why? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_...
It's important for people to know.
Just as marsupials evolved in Australia to fill the roles normally played by mammals, “Democrats” evolved in NY to fill the roles normally played by Republicans.
more people gotta bring this up! it should be wildly obscene by the social standards of regular-ass democrats for this dude to be getting all fuckin' lee atwater with it!!
I worry that the racist's analysis of how the electorate is going to vote is accurate, insofar as the number of progressive voters may hit a cap in this primary. Isn't this what happened in Rhode Island?
Sigh. Too bad this is being framed as "centrists won't vote for a progressive because they're not progressive, but will vote for a racist instead." And too bad that often happens.
