Post

Avatar
I was asked, at great length, a question yesterday that I tried to read as other than "I get that nonbinary people want to use their pronouns of choice, but do the rest of us have to honor that?" And I couldn't. So: Yes. The rest of us do.
Avatar
"But it's confusing!" Pronouns are always confusing. Try copyediting a sex scene between two men. AU: Not sure whose penis "his penis" is here. Can you clarify?
Avatar
Joking quite towardst one side: Yes, the use of they/them/their for one person at a time poses an editorial challenge in terms of clarity. So just toss it onto the pile with the rest of the editorial challenges you have to rise to.
Avatar
Indeed. And for the non-fiction editor, there is no possible way that using they/them could be more awkward than having to enforce “he or she” or “his/her” or “s/he”—all of which are journal house styles I had to follow earlier in my career—and then argue with the author about it.
Avatar
And, happily, all the "he or she" variations are now the deadest ducks. And if you're still using "he" as a pronoun for unspecified theoretical single people whose gender is either unknown or irrelevant: Knock it off.
Avatar
I’m a freelance sensitivity reader and my biggest repeat client is a college textbook publisher, and I still correct on average between 100-500 pronoun usages towards the gender inclusive “they” per text. It’s exhausting.
Avatar
And by the time I get it, the manuscript has already been through several rounds of editors if not multiple published editions with “he or she” or singular “he” for general nonspecific use intact.