Post

Avatar
A president supporting court packing for the explicit purpose of reigning in presidential power, including his own, after a Supreme Court made a wildly un-American, precedent-breaking decision to expand it, would be making the best case for a president to support court-packing.
Avatar
That's reining, not reigning. As in horses, not kings.
Avatar
Whoops. My bad. Thanks for pointing it out.
Avatar
You're a dear. And I agree with your argument, btw.
Avatar
Avatar
Frankly I thought the threat to overturn Roe would have been enough to do that, but clearly the Dems would rather watch the country burn than do something.