Post
Can we maybe get this bullshit updated?
What's *conservative* about a decision that actually the Founding Fathers did kinda intend for the president to be a king? What is this decision conserving?
I'd change "conservative" to maybe "conservative-authoritarian"
it's conserving power in the hands of rich white men, which is something Washington and Madison absolutely supported
White privilege. That's what it's conserving.
I mean, monarchists are pretty conservative
Can change photo to a pig head?
🐷
In awe of your powers sometimes. No immunity for them though.
Right-wing jurisimprudence, more like
