Gale Has a Point: Regardless, not a single one of the founding fathers or their interlocutors ever said, 'the president should be able to start wars then Congress will be stuck funding them.' Just the opposite. And that's what executives could already do before this decision

Because as is well known, the first American Revolution was fought against the tyranny of faculty senates. (Read the transcript in the link.)

Heritage Foundation president celebrates Supreme Court presidential immunity ruling: "We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be" www.mediamatters.org/project-2025...

Heritage Foundation president celebrates Supreme Court immunity decision: "We are in the process of the second American Revolution"www.mediamatters.org

If you asked an LLM to paraphrase this it would say, 'unless the university profs and MSNBC anchors take up arms against us, the revolution will be bloodless. Also something about Federalist #70 arguing for a strong executive which doesn't sound to me like what the Federalists wanted. Hamilton maybe

Regardless, not a single one of the founding fathers or their interlocutors ever said, 'the president should be able to start wars then Congress will be stuck funding them.' Just the opposite. And that's what executives could already do before this decision

Post