Sean Scott: It's remarkable how Orwell predicted Ben Shapiro.

I'mma say this for all the people in the back. Don't vote for a person. Vote for your rights, for the rights of others. On page 5 of Project 2025's 180-day plan they openly call for outlawing porn, recommending imprisoning anyone who creates it. Are you an NSFW artist, or like the art? THIS IS YOU.

This is one their website. They're laying the groundwork with all these ID laws to shut off all access to it, and if you don't think this applies to you, remember: they view ALL LGBT+ content as porn. There's a hundred other reasons, but if you draw, maybe consider where you'll be in the crossfire.

Just figured I'd add this. 20+ years ago the Justice Department, under Republican rule, declared the statue of Lady Justice obscene and pornographic and covered her with a cloth. They don't respect tasteful nudity. Don't think they'll respect you.

Oh, I remember this and Ashcroft. A lot of what Bush 2 did was the trial run for what we see in Project 2025. People had better get out and vote, because this is no time to screw around or fall back on the smug "both sides!" BS. Because I don't see anything like this coming from Democrats.

Yep. That's the thing. People may not like porn or NSFW, and that's totally fine. But a lot of people do, and of people will be swept up in something that was literally legal the day before. The problem is what they define as "porn" is too broad. Anything they don't like is porn or "the devil."

Exactly. I mean, they would classify a good chunk of fantasy art--like say, from Frazetta or Boris V--as porn.

Music, too. Imagine them going after Cardi B for WAP. Any sort of art will be lumped into specific categories, censored and controlled, and if not... it goes on "the list." And they're openly broadcasting this. It's a tired phrase, but "when people tell you who they are believe them."

"And they're openly broadcasting this." Yep. In a way, that is a good thing. They're not hiding it anymore, so we know exactly what they are planning. Which means we have no excuses; we have to push back on this and the best way is to vote.

What's frightening is that they're boldly open about this. Imagine what *else* they have planned that's still under wraps.

To directly quote a book whose title is conveniently my year of birth, "we will abolish the orgasm".

It's remarkable how Orwell predicted Ben Shapiro.

I have no idea how he and I are the same age when he looks and sounds 20, and that is not a compliment.

I couldn't remember his name but Google helpfully autocompleted "conservative commentator who can't give his wife an orgasm" and, voila.

"conservative who can't give his wife an orgasm" gives a lot of results.

You got to wonder why they'd go around telling people this.

In a patriarchy, women don't matter. They're expected to be obedient vessels, and women's orgasms are evil affronts to god. They view selfishness as positive. They're bragging.

That's a thought process with five steps of reasoning. Sure they're smart enough to follow that?

Post