Post
*SUPREME COURT BACKS JAN. 6 DEFENDANT, CURBING USE OF ENRON LAW
No decision link yet, just the headline for now Deleted a previous saying it was 5-4. 6-3 opinion with Jackson concurring and ACB dissenting.
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...www.supremecourt.gov
6-3, but it's Barrett-Sotomayor-Kagan dissenting, Jackson concurred.
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p... 
