Phil Feldman, PhD: Yeah, I’d be much more interested in the saliencey of the terms used in the making of the recommendations. What is the model looking at?

“UW researchers found that ChatGPT consistently ranked resumes with disability-related honors and credentials — such as the ‘Tom Wilson Disability Leadership Award’ — lower than the same resumes without those honors and credentials.”

ChatGPT is biased against resumes with credentials that imply a disability — but it can improvewww.washington.edu UW researchers found that ChatGPT consistently ranked resumes with disability-related honors and credentials — such as the “Tom Wilson Disability Leadership Award” — lower than the same...

Interesting and important work. I'm not convinced that asking LLMs to explain themselves provides actual insight into their decision-making process, but this is a second-order quibble.

Yeah, I’d be much more interested in the saliencey of the terms used in the making of the recommendations. What is the model looking at?

Post