Well, that was fast. Injunction granted in Netchoice v Fitch, Mississippi's age verification, deanonymization, and mandated censorship law: netchoice.org/wp-content/u...
Final brag count, having read the decision: Two namedrops, three citations to my declaration, woohoo!
A great decision, and I'm pleased to see that the judge joined the judge in the Ohio suit in going straight for strict scrutiny, no waffling involved.
Also, lolllll.
call me petty but I'm pretty chuffed to see DW listed in front of all the other services in section B
I definitely read that as
"H.B. 1126 regulates some services offered by the following of NetChoice’s members: (1) Dreamwidth; (2) a bunch of randos of lesser import" 😅
