I'm not a lawyer so I'm not going to read their decision but Is the argument going to be about Jan 6 and the former president's involvement or are they going to argue that presidents are immune from justice?
The latter, with Jan 6 and its related conspiracies hovering in the background. The Court phrased the question as whether “a former President enjoy(s) presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.”
