Alisa Bokulich: "Resetting the public’s understanding of how science works will be a big job...Unfortunately, most programs...[have] few if any requirements on the history & philosophy of science...[A] shift in curricula would ultimately produce a public that is more literate in the way that science works" #philsci

"Resetting the public’s understanding of how science works will be a big job...Unfortunately, most programs...[have] few if any requirements on the history & philosophy of science...[A] shift in curricula would ultimately produce a public that is more literate in the way that science works" #philsci

The scientific enterprise continues to be questioned when ideas are revised in light of new data. To most scientists, this is such a natural part of science that we take it for granted. We (includes me) need to do a better job of saying "this is what we know now." www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

Teach philosophy of sciencewww.science.org Much is being made about the erosion of public trust in science. Surveys show a modest decline in the United States from a very high level of trust, but that is seen for other institutions as well. Wh...

"What is apparent from the surveys is that a better explanation of the nature of science—that it is revised as new data surface—would have a strong positive effect on public trust." Equally true for public understanding of historical knowledge and Wissenschaft more broadly.

It seems that if the misunderstanding stems from the person not taking the time to understand, then trying to teach them the philosophy of science is unlikely to help.

Post