Challenge: Choose 20 books that greatly influenced you. One book per day, for 20 days. No explanations, no reviews. Just covers. 3/20 (Two in one today because I skipped yesterday.) #BookSky
Am rereading the Alexander decision and almost choked on the Alito line, "[W]e must be wary of plaintiffs who seek to transform federal courts into 'weapons of political warfare' that will deliver victories that eluded them 'in the political arena.'"
There are two elements to the immunity decision that are particularly extreme in a way that many will miss: (1) motive is irrelevant and (2) immune acts are not just excluded from prosecution, they’re excluded from evidence.
/1
Imagine what the discourse on prosecuting Trump would be like if instead of pardoning Nixon, Ford had let his DOJ prosecute him for some of the many things they could have prosecuted him for
Reading the SCOTUS Trump immunity decision and can't stop thinking maybe it's good for a president thinks "is this a crime?" before doing something. But because I respect the rule of law I silence my doubts.
You know the US is a country of the middle class because our two most sacred documents are a procedural manual (the Constitution) and an angry letter to management (the Declaration of Independence).
Treating ancient Roman and Greek rhetoric books as representative of their political cultures is like some future historian assuming the NYT editorial page tells them everything they need to understand 21st century US political culture.
Me: why don’t clients see how utterly fucking disruptive and useless lying to me is and how it’s against their best interests
Also me: Exercise? Oh doctor thanks for asking. Six times a week. I don’t do seven because I don’t want to get too ripped
Reading Kierkegaard is wild because he will be on a six page jag of pseudo Hegelian gibberish and I want to throw the book away. Then suddenly he has a moving five paragraph discussion the ways we can give up on claiming our self and I am like
Reading Kierkegaard is wild because he will be on a six page jag of pseudo Hegelian gibberish and I want to throw the book away. Then suddenly he has a moving five paragraph discussion the ways we can give up on claiming our self and I am like