So Hinton is taking exactly 1 component of the *potential* frameworks of human understanding, & claiming that 1) that is all of human understanding, 2) that generative "AI" understands in exactly the same way, & thus 3) that generative "AI" understands like humans.
Honestly that's just bad logic.
I really really want to know what he means by "hasn't worked". The models haven't worked? There's no science to back up that theory? It was too hard to model on a computer so he gave up? This guy should shut up forever but also I really REALLY want to know.
