This deserves a longer write up than I can give it right now, but Biden would be much better off arguing that Trump isn’t a valid candidate than arguing that we should pick him over Trump. He’s avoided it because he thinks Trump is his only argument, but he needs more if we’re gonna win this.
Trump v Anderson is much more vulnerable than it appears at first blush, and if I were a blue state AG, I would consider announcing that I won’t print ballots with his name because the Supreme Court says he’s disqualified. Invite Congress to intervene if they want to compel me to change.
Time for them to get on the stick and go do it,
but most of the battleground states aren't blue, or at least don't have both Dem legislatures and governors who'll let them.
Still, a wide repetition of "Trump's disqualified due to insurrection" might help.
Arizona, Michigan, and Pennsylvania all have Democratic AGs. It would be extremely good for their state GOP parties to aggressively argue that they’re not allowed to do it. The Enforcement Act of 1870 was written for states refusing to comply with Section 2; they can argue that they don’t need it.
