Post

Avatar
In London, "traffic accidents have fallen in the capital by an astonishing 40% since 2003," the year of the introduction of the congestion pricing program. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015...
Literally happened minutes ago: a truck driver killed a cyclist at an intersection that will be within the congestion pricing zone. Could we get a more stark and timely reminder of why congestion pricing is not just about the revenue? It's about making our STREETS SAFER.
Avatar
Avatar
What about my freedom to be run over??
Avatar
Avatar
I agree with this generally, but I feel like we should charge based on the price of the car, rather than a flat rate, and let low-income people off the hook. Otherwise, we end up with a tax that disproportionately affects the poor.
Avatar
Avatar
I'd also argue that right now traffic congestion disproportionately affects the poor, especially those who take the bus!
Avatar
I live in a city with terrible public transit, high car dependency, and increasingly dangerous roads for cyclists as congestion increases without much additional cycling infrastructure. Anything that improves public transit would be welcome here, including congestion fees, as long as it's fair.
Avatar
As long as those discounts are readily available, then it seems fairly reasonable to me.
Avatar
Yeah, the one criticism I have of them is that in some cases they are tax credits and not immediate discounts. It’s a bit complicated. But there are accommodations for low-income people.
Avatar
There are a ton of people who don't/can't own a car and this includes many many actual poor people.