It is a two-box day at SCOTUS, so we are expecting up to four decisions. There are four cases remaining, including Trump immunity and the APA accrual rule case. The NetChoice cases out of Florida and Texas could come as one or two decisions. Here we go.
First is Corner Post. Barrett has the court's 6-3 ideological decision holding that APA claims accrue from plaintiff's injury, not the date of the final rule — opening up all rules to possible new challenges. Jackson writes the dissent for the liberals. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
Jackson is reading from her dissent — meaning all three Democratic appointees have read from their dissent in one of the big administrative law cases decided over the past week, a clear attempt to highlight the importance of these decisions. (Not that SCOTUS lets you hear.)
Next up: NetChoice, in one decision by Kagan. Neither circuit got it right in the content moderation cases, the 6-3 court rules. The 5th Circuit decision rests on a "serious misunderstanding" of the First Amend. Alito, w Thomas & Gorsuch, dissents. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
I feel like any time those three are in a dissent they’re effectively put in detention for eating paste.
It makes the mental picture of the three of them easier to stomach.
Can’t wait to see what their dissent looks like.
Literally a company could be set up to SPECIFICALLY be injured by some fucking rule made decades ago and they would have 6 years to then bring challenge, this is the dumbest fucking shit
I feel like a WWII Merchant Marine sailor, watching helplessly as the torpedoes speed towards my ship. My ship's named the United States of America, and it's already listing badly.