Post

Avatar
I know smut may seem like a frivolous thing to be upset about, but crushing it is part of fascism. Controlling all forms of sexual expression is fascism. Only allowing certain kinds is fascism. Smut peddlers are always canaries in the coal mines.
Avatar
Controlling telecommunications in order to "fight pornography" sound like they're creating a problem to get to the solution they really want. Any platform speaking out against them gets shut down, since there was "porn" on it somewhere. Trust us on this claim though, since we already deleted it.
Adult Content
Labeled by Bluesky Moderation Service
Avatar
I will stand firm in the belief that the ability of the govt to control them has long since passed in the US. They have tried before. They will try again. But they forget at this point the government relies more on the carriers than vice/versa and the carriers answer more to their shareholders.
Avatar
Even the DoD’s network (outside of tactical/combat comms) is handled by commercial carriers. They may have dedicated circuits, but those are provided by the big backbone companies. And those companies could easily turn them all off in protest of laws they couldn’t possibly comply with.
Avatar
But they make a lot of money off the government and certainly aren't responsible for or interested in maintaining the civil rights of their subscribers. Telecom companies have eagerly complied with the rapid decay of the 4th Amendment at SCOTUS and law enforcement, well beyond what's required by law
Sexually Suggestive
Labeled by Bluesky Moderation Service
Avatar
They make a lot of money off the government but they make more off the private sector. Mass surveillance was never supposed to be discovered and it didn’t impact customers, and it was “comply and get more federal contracts” It made sense for them to do that…
Avatar
I don't think the majority of their corporate clients are going to go to court to fight government anti-pornography measures. They'll just shrug and say they already outsourced this problem - to the telecoms.
Sexually Suggestive
Labeled by Bluesky Moderation Service
Avatar
Not to mention that if you really wanted to ban all porn and other “thoughtcrime” you would also have to ban or backdoor all encryption. Otherwise, there is no way to know exactly what people are looking at. Corporations would fight that, because it’s the only way to keep anything confidential.
Avatar
{conspiracy hat on} Ban all encryption, you say? Maybe that's their end goal with this whole situation. Knowing what people are looking at is a really useful tool for controlling what people get access to and how. Especially coupled with being able to shut down services by shouting "porn" at them.
Adult Content
Labeled by Bluesky Moderation Service
Avatar
Today we have fully open-source crypto that nobody can break, barring weaknesses in individual implementations. The algorithms are sound, even the government is using them. That ship has sailed.
Avatar
My guess is that kind of technology would be on their hit list too. As long as they can find a way to exempt their own crypto dealings.
Adult Content
Labeled by Bluesky Moderation Service
Avatar
Once upon a time only governments had strong crypto. Both improving our own and breaking others is a big reason the NSA was formed. But then DES was declassified, presumably after NSA was capable of breaking it. So the public used it, but wanted better. Then RSA leaked and AES was openly developed.
Avatar
Point being that stopping crypto is like stopping piracy. You literally can’t do it. It’s baked right into the hardware of every modern device. If the government said “AES is now illegal” then Apple would say “ok, we’re just gonna have to brick every iPhone” which would cripple the government too.
Avatar
That last part is sarcasm, of course. Apple would be the first to fight any proposed ban on cryptography, but they might just brick government iPhones (which is now EVERY government issued phone!) in protest.