i don't normally make statements when we list people, but we're adding ollie/artsypawz to the zoophile mute list. this comes after months of deliberation, not just on my part, but the rest of my team and some of ollie's former friends. š§µ
this wasn't the first time they've interacted with an open zoophile. in november, they knowingly interacted with arlaux, who, at the time, identified as an open zoophile:
additionally, they've suggested multiple times across multiple accounts that people who identify as zoophiles are not abusers, going as far back as september of last year:
it's our belief that while paraphiles aren't inherently abusers, participating in the wider zoophile community enables the cycle of abuse, even for anti-contact zoophiles. you should seek support from therapists who specialize in paraphilias, not people who normalize animal sexual abuse. /end
man I am so glad I set the list to block because seeing these people talk like this makes my blood boil.
"I personally decide not to engage in beastiality because of my own framework" well whoopdie fucking doo you're still a freak, fix your shit
thanks again for your dedication to the list heika
Yeah, I didn't realise any of this was going on then because...there was just *so much shit* being flung around it made things extremely confusing.
Very regrettable to see this turn of events.
A lot of us had these people blocked, and Bluesky doesn't often show us interactions our mutuals are having with blocked accounts (which is generally a good thing!) but it also hides stuff like this.
that set of posts with the "nuance" towards zeta accounts was my first point of conflict with him.
Funny how that was literally one day before the shitstorm with hugo started. I hate this. I hate this.
yup. I remember he had a jonesing for blood when the whole KF issue was the hot topic and kept ragging the list over and over again. Was insufferable. Suppose that should have been a warning on its own.
