Post

Recently, I was peer reviewing a paper, and it cited one of my papers. Except... it wasn't anything I had written. The title sounds like something I'd write. It included coauthors I work with, and was in a journal I've published in. But it wasn't real. AI is not good for science.

And it means the person (?) who wrote the paper clearly did not read it - undermining credibility of the paper as a whole.