Post

Avatar
This is what the logic of the opinion demands, though that doesn't necessarily mean that the Court will do it (it has drawn unprincipled distinctions before)
There is also every reason to think that this court will expand Trump v. U.S in his second term to extend immunity to those doing his bidding. I.e., “Our holding in Trump v. U.S. demands that government officials be able to enact the will of the executive without fear of criminal proceedings.”