Post

Avatar
Avatar
Someone says so is the proof?
Avatar
Avatar
Yeah but it’s one guy vs one guy? That’s something but… quite a distance from proof
Avatar
Court isn’t CSI. Many, many issues are resolved by weighing one person’s word against another.
Avatar
As a jurist I had a really hard time with this…
Avatar
Sorry, juror. Not a jurist!
Avatar
Did Ashleigh get her mortgage paid off, à la Kavanaugh?
Avatar
Yes that’s precisely my point. It’s just a guy vs a guy at this point.
Avatar
So, it’s just how most disputed issues are resolved in court?
Avatar
Yes exactly. A credibility battle between 2 guys isn’t the smoking gun that was implied heavily previously in this saga in my opinion. Maybe they win but that’s what it appears to be.
Avatar
Why hasn't court evolved to the point of wrasslin? Two litigants enter; one claimaint wins. All this talkin' is BORING.
Avatar
Dude, seriously, ask people who have been on criminal juries. We've been educated out of a lot of those bad assumptions. Testimony and who you believe and what evidence standard you think that meets is most often what matters.
Avatar
Can I raise a tiny quibble? More re the story’s characterization/ not your skeet. Unless GA has some novel procedure, THEY’RE NOT “CLAIMS BY ATTORNEY ASHLEIGH MERCHANT!!!”
Avatar
Me on jury: yeah yer crap trying to paint trips as paid on taxpayer dough is a non-starter and casts the alleging side in a bad light trying to conflate spending from earned income/salary v reimbursement from county coffers? Eff you…but potential hiring favoritism and bias as separate issue? Maybe…