Sean Eric Fagan: For quite a while, you could determine how it'd be by asking two questions: • Which decision most helps the GOP; long-term should be considered (e.g., approve the ACA because it helps raise rabble). • Which decision would most harm non-white-male-christians?

Me, last Friday: “I can’t think of a single class I less want to teach this fall than strategic political communication. Not in this election season. Not again.” Me, now: “well AT LEAST I’m not teaching Con Law.”

I'm neither a lawyer nor a law student, but I'd think con law would be easy to teach now: just have the students close their eyes and describe the vibes they feel about a case, then have them break up into teams for Calvinball. (sarcasm)

For quite a while, you could determine how it'd be by asking two questions: • Which decision most helps the GOP; long-term should be considered (e.g., approve the ACA because it helps raise rabble). • Which decision would most harm non-white-male-christians?

Now, however, it is: which decision lets the majority impose their particular will on the entire country?

Post