Post

Avatar
It would be super cool if the tech media would simply stop credulously repeating every value-juicing statement C-Suites make like they’re the in-house PR department. The only difference between these hollow promises and the guy crying, “The end is near!” on the street corner is funding.
Avatar
Like she’s blatantly full of shit. No one will follow-up on this. The models have already absorbed every publicly available dissertation ever written so what’s stopping it from being this “smart” now? And it still doesn’t address the “hallucination” problem. It’s a nonsense statement.
Avatar
Microsoft's selective model for STEM was more interesting, just don't grab every garbage thing only use published papers, books, etc
Avatar
Very many things in published STEM papers are incorrect or even fabricated; it still takes discernment to evaluate a paper. Context, reputation of the authors/institution/journal, the appropriateness of the methods used to reach a conclusion… “vacuum everything up” will never work.
Avatar
That and the language used isn’t very straightforward. You could be writing about a counter example and the AI just scrapes the text and repeats it.
Avatar
Good thing there are millions of terrible answers on StackOverflow and Quora