One tiny Chevron saving grace: "today's decision does not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework. The holdings of those cases that specific agency actions are lawful--including the Clean Air Act holding of Chevron itself--are still subject to statutory stare decisis"
Hasn’t this Court, in repeated opinions (Janus, Dobbs, this case), torn a giant hole in Stare Decisis?
“Don’t worry, stare decisis still applies” seems like cold comfort in one of the very cases that’s ripping up a prior Court ruling?
To me this reads as “the responsible circuits should use stare decisis to uphold prior rulings, the 5th will do their 5th circuit thing, and we’ll take up and do whatever we want when ‘circuit splits’ arise”
