One tiny Chevron saving grace: "today's decision does not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework. The holdings of those cases that specific agency actions are lawful--including the Clean Air Act holding of Chevron itself--are still subject to statutory stare decisis"
Hasnāt this Court, in repeated opinions (Janus, Dobbs, this case), torn a giant hole in Stare Decisis?
āDonāt worry, stare decisis still appliesā seems like cold comfort in one of the very cases thatās ripping up a prior Court ruling?
To me this reads as āthe responsible circuits should use stare decisis to uphold prior rulings, the 5th will do their 5th circuit thing, and weāll take up and do whatever we want when ācircuit splitsā ariseā
