Pat Sobkowski

Profile banner

Pat Sobkowski

@pjsobkowski.bsky.social

Prof., Marquette University Department of Political Science. American Political Development, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law. #polisky

📍Milwaukee, WI

https://patsobkowski.com/
Avatar
Apropos of nothing: Justice Thomas wrote a concurrence in Trump v. US, arguing that the special prosecutor is unconstitutional. See (pp. 54-60 of PDF): supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
Avatar
It’s pretty funny that people are blaming the Democrats for rhetoric when GOP congresspersons are literally airing ads of them shooting guns at “woke” objects, etc.
Avatar
Avatar
There is no way we avoid a second Trump term.
Avatar
We adopted Abe today! “With MEOWlice toward none.”
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
1/ I'm agnostic as to whether Biden should withdraw from the race. It's a genuinely tough question IMO. But I have clarity on one thing: He should absolutely not step down as president. If Harris becomes President, the Vice Presidency is empty. Under the 25th Amendment ...
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
Saying someone is presumptively immune from prosecution then barring the introduction of evidence of their mental state is a neat trick.
Avatar
The text matters, say the high lords of the court.
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
Thread 🧵 on the immunity decision. Roberts basically creates 3 big boxes to analyze Presidential immunity claims. 1. Absolute immunity—Core executive power (firing of executive branch officers, pardons) —the president cannot be prosecuted for this—ever. Trump pressuring DOJ officials=immune.
Avatar
Thread 🧵 on the immunity decision. Roberts basically creates 3 big boxes to analyze Presidential immunity claims. 1. Absolute immunity—Core executive power (firing of executive branch officers, pardons) —the president cannot be prosecuted for this—ever. Trump pressuring DOJ officials=immune.
Avatar
Another important point: the majority says conduct that is protected (immune) cannot be used as evidence in another prosecution for unprotected conduct.
basically making a coup legal as long as you discuss it with your vice president. moreover, this way of argumentation that ignores obvious context and treats all reasoning like we're in a law school seminar is just straight-up gaslighting.
Avatar
The tiers of presidential immunity: "core" executive powers/functions: absolute Official acts: presumptive immunity Unofficial acts: no immunity For a court that praises formalism, this test is... not that.
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
This is the actual, original article The Imperial Supreme Court. Accept no imitations from the New York Times, which decided to take the title and idea without attribution (after turning down my op ed with the same title, no less) harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-13...
The Imperial Supreme Court - Harvard Law Reviewharvardlawreview.org The past few years have marked the emergence of the imperial Supreme Court. Armed with a new, nearly bulletproof majority, conservative Justices on the...
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
After last week's developments in administrative law and the presidential election, I fear the "existential challenge to the administrative state" is accelerating. Check out my forthcoming paper in the Georgetown Law Journal on the developments and how to respond. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
THE EXISTENTIAL CHALLENGE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATEpapers.ssrn.com A set of constitutional claims today strikes at the heart of the administrative authority of the federal government. Claims regarding administrative policymakin
Avatar
We’re adopting this little guy soon. His name shall be Abe.
Avatar
Avatar
I also made a constitutional law starter pack. I tried to not double-count administrative law pack members so more people get included! Cc, again: @joshuajfriedman.com go.bsky.app/MDDmJYL
Constitutional Lawbsky.app Join the conversation
Avatar
I made an administrative law starter pack! Give us a follow if you want to read more about how governance works! Cc: @joshuajfriedman.com go.bsky.app/GpfKupZ
Administrative Lawbsky.app Join the conversation
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
Read Dave, who has managed to muster the clarity that I could not this morning
Typed up my notes on last night's Presidential debate. What a mess. It wasn't fatal. But it wasn't nothing either. open.substack.com/pub/davekarp...
Debate notesopen.substack.com It was a bad night. But at least its over. ...Right?
Avatar
Avatar
I wrote something on Loper Bright and the overruling of Chevron for Yale JReg. The essay builds on some themes that I articulated in an essay after Biden v. Nebraska last year (link in comments.) A short 🧵 yalejreg.com/nc/chaos-and-c…
yalejreg.com
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
5th Circuit judges finding out Chevron's been overturned
Avatar
Monday is the last day for SCOTUS opinions. Trump immunity, among others, coming.
Reposted byAvatar Pat Sobkowski
Avatar
More like ChevrOFF deference amirite?
Avatar
Overruling Chevron is nothing but a power grab.
Avatar
The Supreme Court has overruled Chevron. 6-3 on ideological lines. Majority holds that deference to reasonable agency interpretations cannot be squared by the APA. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
www.supremecourt.gov