It's not the worst of it, but what I may be actually angriest about (right now) is Roberts' smarmy smugness and dismissiveness in the final two paragraphs of section IV and the whole of section V. "Fear mongering," "extreme hypotheticals," "our perspective must be more farsighted," and this.
The entire logic of "giving this office the legal power to do something doesn't mean someone will do it" is one of the most absurd opinions I've ever heard.
