Unlike most of you I don't think the decision actually provides legal immunity for Trump to lock up his opponents, but until every use case is put on one side of the line or the other it's only a matter of time til someone tries.
What does the ruling say about "official acts" as evidence? Some people were claiming his talks with Pence about pulling a coup are inadmissible as evidence, but Trump is not being charged for having conversations with the vice president. I'm not well versed in legalise, so I don't fully understand
It says official acts not criminal and of themselves can't be evidence, I believe. Which would put a lot of the DOJ/Pence conversations as inadmissible. Basically the strongest form of executive privilege you can imagine.
