Wil: Yup. Expanding the SC or the number of justices on the SC has nothing to do with Cannon. It doesn't stop her from being a shitheel justice, but at least it's limited to her district and maybe any appellate courts that wind up having to sort through her dumpster fire decisions that get appealed.

District Judge Cannon kept the Trump case against her chief’s advice, NYT reports. www.nytimes.com/2024/06/20/u... 🎁

Judge in Trump Documents Case Rejected Suggestions to Step Asidewww.nytimes.com Two federal judges in South Florida privately urged Aileen M. Cannon to decline the case when it was assigned to her last year, according to two people briefed on the matter. She chose to keep it.

Your supreme court is corrupt. What checks and balances are in place (if at all) to rectify such a situation?

A safe majority in congress would allow them to expand the court such that the corrupt justices end up in minority

It still has nothing to do with Aileen Cannon. She's a federal district judge, not on the Supreme Court.

Similar answer in that case too, impeachment requires a large majority

Yup. Expanding the SC or the number of justices on the SC has nothing to do with Cannon. It doesn't stop her from being a shitheel justice, but at least it's limited to her district and maybe any appellate courts that wind up having to sort through her dumpster fire decisions that get appealed.

Post