Still marveling at Gorsuch's Ohio v. EPA opinion, in which he confused nitrogen oxide (a pollutant) with nitrous oxide (laughing gas). He did this five times, never once getting it right—in an opinion overruling the EPA's own expert scientific analysis! s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24...
how many other justices and clerks must have read over this thing? must have been in the dozens at least. and yet not a single one knew the difference between two-nitrogen compounds and one. idiots
Not the point, but a deep dive into law school admissions would be revealing in this point. GPA and LSAT are the only relevant stats.
In short: incentives are to get a high GPA in undergrad, and not challenge yourself with, say, chemistry.
His dissent in Castro Huerta starts with "In 1831 ... established a foundational rule that would persist over 200 years..." 9 justices and 50 something clerks read that paragraph and told Neil he's the most special boy.
