Post

Avatar
I know they get rolled all the time but for the Times to get rolled by “actually they just want to reclaim the values of Western civilization as they see it … with larger families and fewer immigrants” is the Times putting the 14 words in the paper
Avatar
Long past the time to think the NYT is getting “rolled” and not simply agreeing.
Avatar
Right, whether the reporter got rolled or knew what she was doing, there were multiple layers of editorial leadership who let this run
Avatar
Does the NYT do stories about all the families fleeing from states where doctors are told they have to endanger the lives of pregnant women and ignore their wishes?
Avatar
Their chief concern appears to be feeling socially uneasy around people who don’t hate everyone rather the irl implications of right wing cruelty.
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
And it’s not just “people don’t feel safe,” as the article offers, in a concluding quote. It’s that people—-women, to be more specific—-are👏🏼not👏🏼safe👏🏼….
Avatar
This is a key thing. It isn’t “people frown at me for my grotesque racism” it is actual danger that right wing policies inflict on people.
Avatar
Avatar
Gonna throw a bit of a monkey wrench into the “big family“ aspiration. 😬
Avatar
Avatar
Pregnant people. Trans inclusion is easy and fruitful - we're scrappy and frequently very political.
Avatar
Seriously, it's an easy way to attract dedicated allies if you genuinely respect our values.
Avatar
Or the families fleeing states where their trans kids' care is suddenly withdrawn/criminalized? Or course not.
Avatar
Avatar
Same with the Economist cover with the walker-frame: some numb-nut created it, but several editors let it pass.
Avatar