WalkingTaako🏴‍☠️🏳️: Indeed, the repeated "Well, I'm not talking about this case" we heard from conservatives gives the game away. They know that if they focus on this case, they can easily rule that there's no immunity for any of the acts he's be prosecuted for" (cont)

i think the best way to understand the supreme court's conduct in trump v. united states is as an explicit effort to intervene in the 2024 election on behalf of the former president. it is a gross abuse of power on par with dred scott and deserves to be met with sanction from the elected branches.

My thoughts on the oral argument and what the Court is likely to do:

Indeed, the repeated "Well, I'm not talking about this case" we heard from conservatives gives the game away. They know that if they focus on this case, they can easily rule that there's no immunity for any of the acts he's be prosecuted for" (cont)

But by pretending that this case is bigger than that they can delay months by claiming that they need to use this opportunity to delineate what POTUS *is* immune for - most of which is already commonly accepted. And ignore that by expanding this case, they delay justice.

Post