Post

Avatar
Holden Thorp's Science editorial on science pedagogy, #HPS #histsci, and realistic perceptions of scientific method arrives almost exactly 50 years after Stephen Brush's famous Science article on the same subject, "Should the History of Science Be Rated X?" doi.org/10.1126/scie...
The scientific enterprise continues to be questioned when ideas are revised in light of new data. To most scientists, this is such a natural part of science that we take it for granted. We (includes me) need to do a better job of saying "this is what we know now." www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
Teach philosophy of sciencewww.science.org Much is being made about the erosion of public trust in science. Surveys show a modest decline in the United States from a very high level of trust, but that is seen for other institutions as well. Wh...
Avatar
I know you've talked about this on social media before, but have you written anything more lengthy on the topic? Am working on a paper about amnesiac rhetorics/reinventing the wheel of interdisciplinarity and am wondering if there's connections to be drawn here
Avatar
I've never formalized it, but I've been attuned for a while to narratives in which history of science plays the role of methodological savior. I get into it a bit in the conclusion of my book Rational Action, and this post pulls directly from this blog post: rational-action.com/etherwave/20...
Avatar
Thankyou! The bigger question I'm circling around is *why* do these repeated arguments get forgotten?
Avatar
Avatar
Wow. There's an actual person called Holden Thorp? In an early series of Frasier, Holden Thorp was a progressive mayoral (or something) candidate who turned out to believe he had been abducted by aliens. [TFI Friday comedy skeet alert.]
Avatar