Yeah, this really does raise some pretty serious alarms about the editorial decision making at the Times. I mean, I think we already know the answers, but it's clear they're willing to run *anything* on Biden, even if two seconds of research completely undermines the (unstated) premise of the story.
knowing that the white house just signed a massive parkinson’s bill in july changes the entire tone of this story so much that this makes it wildly, horrifically offensive
