The more I think about this, what’s worrying to me isn’t the article, but the fact nymag decided to print it. They wouldn’t print it w/o more to back it up, right?
I mean, I have felt for a long time that there’s been a vacuum in leadership. Even if the president isn’t as bad as this “report,” he just isn’t able to get the very simple message across of why Trump is bad. Did you see the Times article about his interviews this weekend?
maybe if it's clear that it's 1 person's take - but that's not what the article implies ("many elite supporters"). I'm open to persuasion though - maybe I'm misunderstanding journalistic ethics.
IMO this has become more of a norm especially during the Trump years - getting numerous not-for-attribution sources and letting the collective weight of them carry a story that no one person would confirm if named. Not saying it’s good practice because it’s easy to get played by unnamed sources.
She broke into Corey Lewandowski’s house, she tried to use a recording device in the Trump trial and the judge threatened to kick out all the reporters are the two instances that come to mind