The validity of the factual information in the hypothetical is not relevant to the case being argued: whether GPT augmented searches can act as a FIRST STEP in a stream of steps which include fact validation. I wasn't going to put that much time into validating the facts of a fucking hypothetical.
I think your AI must have garbled what you meant to type, which surely was:
"I am now becoming aware of just how many crucial things I don't know about this subject, which led me to the erroneous conclusion that this is an area where a current LLM could help instead of being a huge liability!"