the New York Times has descended into total nihilism; it doesn't give a damn about the truth, only about damaging Democrats and helping Trump. So it presents a video it acknowledges to be misleadingly edited as evidence for its thesis.
Setting the particular topic aside for a second, this is a truly spectacular case of the Times' pathologically incompetent "Where there's fire, there's smoke" theory of writing up high-stakes investigative stories
Donald Trump spent the debate lying, saying racist stuff, refusing to accept the results of the election, and not making much sense at all, but the New York Times has done very little follow-up on any of that. It's just wall-to-wall Biden. They've chosen sides.
Trump lying isn’t news. It’s baked in already.
Biden being so befuddled he proclaims “We finally beat Medicare” to the shock and horror of an entire nation is news.
This is not merely a glib and dumb standard, you are also inconsistently applying it. Joe Biden has been old for years, voters have expressed concern about Joe Biden being old for years.
Your insistence on holding Trump to a lower standard speaks volumes.
People are free to vote or not vote for any candidate for any reason.
One is not allowed to cast multiple ballots. If the voter votes for more than one candidate, the ballot is considered spoiled and the votes aren't counted.
People who want to get more votes for their preferred candidates should reach out to targeted voters.
In the race for POTUS, a small number of states matter in a close election. There are various sources that can identify priority states.
Best of luck!
