Eileen Clancy: If NYT doesn't have 10-20 reporters on the Heritage Foundation rn, they're not doing their job. Does that seem like a lot? There were 3 bylines on a story about the residences of 4 Jewish Brooklyn Museum officials being vandalized. (Turned out only 1 is Jewish. They got the correction wrong too.)

If NYT doesn't have 10-20 reporters on the Heritage Foundation rn, they're not doing their job. Does that seem like a lot? There were 3 bylines on a story about the residences of 4 Jewish Brooklyn Museum officials being vandalized. (Turned out only 1 is Jewish. They got the correction wrong too.)

IDK kind of feels like we should be paying more attention to a prominent conservative think tank saying we're in the midst of a second american revolution that will remain bloodless as long as long as the left lets it be, then whether or not Biden should step down.

P.S. Me noting incredibly sloppy reporting/editing on that Brooklyn Museum story doesn't mean I think it wasn't important to cover. They f'ed up a very important story. They frightened people with misinfo, while never grasping why it had been done. (My view: activists misunderstood earlier events.)

AP just published its story on the Heritage Foundation outburst yesterday on Bannon's show. "A conservative leading the pro-Trump Project 2025 suggests there will be a new American Revolution"

A conservative leading the pro-Trump Project 2025 suggests there will be a new American Revolutionapnews.com The leader of a conservative think tank planning for a massive overhaul of the federal government says we are in the midst of “a second American Revolution” that will be bloodless “if the left allows ...

Post