Recently, I was peer reviewing a paper, and it cited one of my papers.
Except... it wasn't anything I had written. The title sounds like something I'd write. It included coauthors I work with, and was in a journal I've published in.
But it wasn't real.
AI is not good for science.
Can you elaborate on your response?
This is basically submitting falsified research for publication.
This is how the next Wakefield will get into print.
