Post

Blocked.
Avatar
I find it difficult to believe you looked very hard, as it was easily available. More importantly, why did you think it was appropriate to say anything at all without having engaged with the primary source that you knew existed? It’s easy to wait.
Avatar
Just because it’s available doesn’t mean it’s accessible. Yesterday morning was the first time I had available to sit down and listen to even one hour of audio, and I still haven’t had the opportunity to listen to the other three. That’s why I had been asking for the details of the accusers’ claims.
Avatar
I also didn’t have the energy to listen to it until yesterday. But even in my personal life I didn’t say anything but the bare minimum until I had because I am not going to say shit about sexual violence when all I have is hearsay and wild speculation!
Avatar
The only thing I saw people saying was “what are the actual statements from the actual people involved?” I still don’t understand why seeking out the victims’ stories is somehow troublesome.
Avatar
You and I agree that seeking out victims stories is important. I think you did good work making a transcript available. Where we may disagree is whether it’s appropriate to spend A LOT of time sharing skepticism without first engaging with a source.
Avatar
I think it’s inappropriate to make SO MANY posts like this without getting information, and inappropriate to defend it. It’s fine to wait for more information, not fine to put a LOT of time into criticizing media you haven’t engaged with yet when doing so leads here.
Avatar
At the time she made that statement, honestly, I’m not sure how you could know for sure that the podcasters had spoken to two actual women outside of listening to the podcast itself. I certainly looked long and hard for that information and could not find it.
Avatar
And you know? Nobody was supplying that info, either! Nobody was saying “The accusers spoke to the podcasters. The podcast heavily features the accusers speaking in their own voices.” Nobody was providing that clarity. I’ve been doing my best to get it out there, but I feel like I’m the only one!
Avatar
Am I misremembering or wasn’t Salty herself not sharing the podcasts because it’s TERF status? Also I still want to see Gaiman’s statement to them, not just their characterization of the statement.
Avatar
I forget what was happening, it was a lot of fog of war. But I do not and will not apologize for not giving a ton of credence to the “maybe she wanted it, amirite?” people.
Avatar
I believe the accounts, but the article and first hour of podcast listening leave me kind of stunned how cavalier the ‘journalism’ component here is. They levy serious allegations then just say “listen to her story, and we understand that in his private statement Neil disagrees”
Avatar
Scarlett’s story is SO credible that they didn’t need a lot more. Add on the corroborating interview with the friend and I’m done. I don’t need to know what Neil says to know that I believe her, and I think the people trying to frame the story through his “admission” are sidelining her pretty hard.
Avatar
Like, even now, the story is about the power dynamic of the employment relationship and not about the fact that he painfully sexually violated her without her consent and after she had told him “no” repeatedly.
Avatar
Wait what? No lie, this is the first time I’ve heard this about lack of consent. For me, the media framing has been entirely about the power dynamic.
Avatar
Yep. He got naked into the bath with her and touched and caressed her repeatedly for what appears to be the better part of an hour while she indicated that she did not want him to, and then penetrated her with his fingers without her consent. She was up all night googling “Neil Gaiman MeToo.”
Avatar
Avatar
Okay, wow, thank you. I...wow.
Avatar
And when I think about how the podcasters were the only people who had all the information unless you were willing to sit through a four hour podcast, and how any news outlet that wanted a scoop would be reliant on their press pack, and what they chose to put out there was THIS?
Avatar
That’s what I’m sitting with for the moment. I didn’t trust TERFs to not be running an agenda…and it looks like they were as the framing they chose is actually minimizing harm?(!!!!) I don’t like single-source stories in any case, did not expect to expand my list of reasons why for this.
Avatar
Until reading the transcript, I didn't realize Scarlett is a lesbian.
Avatar
Also, a detail that’s fairly buried in the podcast is that although they had *hired* her with the promise of an hourly wage, they did not actually *pay* her anything.
Avatar
This is definitely the first time I'm seeing this much info, thanks for sharing. All I've seen til this was there were accusations.
Avatar
(to be clear, I was prepared to believe them even if I did really enjoy his work for the past two decades, I just didn't know what was actually being said)
Avatar
I only got to Page 12 here, Kathryn, but this is sounding beat for beat like how Keith Raniere worked with many of his victims nearer the beginning. Later on, Keith would get intermediary girls to do all the work, to diffuse his responsibility.
Avatar
Avatar
Scarlett also says Amanda told her she was at least the 14th girl to tell her that he made unwanted advances.
Avatar
And it was Palmer who befriended Scarlett after meeting her “by chance on the street,” scooped her up, and delivered her to her husband.
Avatar
Oh god I feel sick. That poor woman.
Avatar
The power dynamic is clearly not okay.
Avatar
The power dynamic is fucked up. The sexual assault is a crime.
Avatar
That’s WHY I do care some about statements and corroboration.
Avatar
Yeah. Testimony is evidence. I wish the podcasters had centered her testimony instead of their “understanding” of his.
Avatar
But, well, I guess that wasn’t the story they wanted to tell.
Avatar
I feel, in fact, that the podcasters completely missed the mark on portraying her evidence. Her testimony struck me as highly credible for the exact reasons they said there were reasons to doubt.
Avatar
EXACTLY. But to be honest? I’m not sure they missed their mark. I’m beginning to suspect that they, in fact, hit *their* mark dead center.
Avatar
If you interview the podcaster then you yourself aren’t committing any libel that may be actionable.
Avatar
The first part is obvious, clear, and even corroborated by Neil himself. I have focused on that because that is enough to damn him in my eyes, and it is incontrovertible.
Avatar
IMHO, it’s all incontrovertible. I reject the idea that the conversation should center on his story and not hers.
Avatar
The only part about his story I care about is that ALONE it is enough to go “yeet him into the sun” Pitty I liked his work, but “separate art from a badly behaving artist” doesn’t work for me
Avatar
Bingo. I have a friend who tries to separate Kanye from his art and I’m like bruh.
Avatar
Avatar
I am not centring his story, I'm just saying that what he admits is enough to damn him, as it proves that he couldn't have had consent regardless of what happened; whatever he wants to claim is irrelevant because of it.
Avatar
Thing is, we don't actually have what he admits; we have what Tortoise media "understands" his claims/position to be. (unless I missed it and he issued a statement) Therefore, I'd go with the story we _do_ have directly: Scarlett's extensive account as played in the podcast.