How does Roberts square his decision now with his repudiation of Korematsu, "The forcible relocation of U.S. citizens to concentration camps, solely and explicitly on the basis of race, is objectively unlawful and outside the scope of Presidential authority"? How is it so when you can't review acts?
Roberts doesn’t even square his disapproval of korematsu with his disapproval of korematsu.
Korematsu specifically disavowed the thing Roberts said was korematsu’s holding when he disavowed it.
him "disavowing it" in TvHI made me sick in my stomach anyway. Like, how fucking dare you say you're repudiating Korematsu in a case where you're holding the Muslim Ban legal. Fucking monstrous decision.
While i do love that SpongeBob memes have finally given English a diacritical sarcasm marker (sincerely linguistically fascinating!) i wish it were less painful to read
It wasn’t just substantively monstrous.
If i described Korematsu like that in a brief, the judge would be justified in imposing Rule 11 sanctions for misrepresenting a cited authority.
