along similar lines, has anyone actually explained *why* the seal team six hypo is ruled out by the majority opinion? all I've seen is right-leaning law profs mocking everyone who raises the issue. but nobody has explained why a president wouldn't be immune for assassinating a rival
Checking on prominent originalists on the other site, I can't find one who has criticized yesterday's anti-textualist immunity opinion. All have tweeted on other topics. Here are the reactions:
Mocks dissent: Barnett
Silence: Baude, Green, McGinnis, Rappaport, Sachs, Whittington
Baseball head guy on the hell site thinks that murdering rivals would be enough to finally trigger an impeachment that removes the President.
Lolololol
